Publisher: Electronic Arts
What can we say about this game that hasn’t been said already?
Crysis was probably the most anticipated game on the PC last year and was released on November 16th 2007.
Crysis is seen by many as the poster boy for DirectX 10 and it will make your system cry, quite literally – it’s a monster! It doesn’t come as much of a surprise then, that the graphics are something special – they’re above and beyond anything we’ve ever seen in a PC game.
We tested the game using the 64-bit executable under both DirectX 9.0 and DirectX 10 with the 1.21 patch applied. We used a custom timedemo recorded from the Laws of Nature level which is more representative of gameplay than the built-in benchmark that renders things much faster than you're going to experience in game. We found that around 30-33 fps in our custom timedemo was sufficient enough to obtain a playable frame rate through the game. It's a little different to other games in that the low frame rates still appear to be quite smooth.
For our testing, we set all quality details to High and forced 8x Anisotropic Filtering in the driver menu as there is currently no support for it in game. We tested at 1280x1024, using 0x, 2x and 4x Anti Aliasing, 1680x1050 using 0x and 4x Anti Aliasing and 1920x1200 using 0x and 2xAA. By extensively testing using Anti Aliasing in very high resolutions, we'll be pushing even the bleeding edge hardware on test to the limit.
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
-
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GX2
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 TOXIC
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850
-
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Frames Per Second
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
-
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GX2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
-
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 TOXIC
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850
-
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Frames Per Second
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
-
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GX2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870
-
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 TOXIC
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
-
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Frames Per Second
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
-
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GX2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 TOXIC
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850
-
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Frames Per Second
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870
-
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 TOXIC
-
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GX2
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Frames Per Second
-
ATI Radeon 4870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
-
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GX2
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 TOXIC
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850
-
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Frames Per Second
-
ATI Radeon 4870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280
-
Nvidia Geforce 9800 GX2
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870
-
Sapphire ATI Radeon 4850 TOXIC
-
ATI Radeon HD 4850
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
-
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
-
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT
-
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Frames Per Second
The same performance trend is found in DX9 Crysis, with the HD 4850 performing between four and eight percent faster than the stock version, but still some way off of the HD 4870.
Want to comment? Please log in.